If a topic has the demonized 3 letter word or anything that might be associated with it presented to them, most Christians will stick to it like rubber cement. There are more official church stances on sexual topics than Penthouse has yet had the opportunity to explore...
Sex is not the most covered topic of the Bible by any means, but Christians sure do devote allot of time to it. There is more time devoted on what is acceptable and not acceptable sexually than there is time devoted on how to show true Agape to the people around us.
The Old Law has many requirements correlating between sex and marriage... In the Old Testament, sex was pretty much the equal of marriage. Even today, the views of marriage have strong sexual overtones within the church.
... The sad thing is that I feel Christianity has truly misrepresented marriage and what it should be in favor of the idea that a penis belongs in a vagina... The church esteems the commandment to "Go forth and procreate" higher than the Golden Rule.
Well, I'm just going to say right now that I think Christians have the wrong idea about marriage in the first place. Marriage and homosexuality are 2 things that I really feel Christians need to re-educate themselves about.
So, for anyone reading this who might have a "Marriage=1Man+1Woman" bumper-sticker adorning their rear cargo hold... Why do you think marriage must be defined this way? Is it because you see two interlocking assemblies in the crotches of the opposite sexes? That is usually the first argument I hear against homosexuality... A woman has the appropriate coupler for a man's fitting...
So many of us grow up in church and hear for as long as we can remember, the lesson of the "Bride of Christ", and how as part of the church, that is what we as a congregation are. Sometimes, when we would hear arguments against homosexuality, the subject of "Christ's Bride" is reiterated in a way such as to try to prove that a homosexual couple is not a valid pairing.
Some people use the argument saying a bride is a woman, and a groom is a man; totally logical when we think of one entity entering into the bonds of marriage with a few million men and women as a group ... Or that a couple is supposed to mirror Christ's example... Which still doesn't invalidate the love a homosexual couple can feel for each other...
I have even heard it argued that it is the purpose of the Bride of Christ to procreate and to develop the children of Christ. To this camp of debaters, the idea is that the "Bride of Christ" is the model of what Christian marriages should be. Two people of the same sex cannot procreate, thus they cannot be truly married in the spirit of Christ....
These arguments make my brain hurt...
Other arguments against homosexuality, not to mention gay marriage, pretty much are exclusively debated by Old Testament Law...
The same Law that forbids people mixing milk with meat - Anyone have a cheeseburger recently? ...
The same Law that forbids women who are menstruating from associating with men- What do you think would happen if all of the women in the workplace had a week off every month? Well, life WOULD probably be happier. LOL- But it's not gonna happen.
The same Law that commands a woman must marry her rapist- We don't force that on anyone, WITH GOOD REASON...
The same Law that would see those who cheat on their spouses be punished with death...
Anyways, when you read the Law of the OT, you see that marriage was pretty much defined by the act of sex. A woman would be legally bound to a man if she had sex with him, even if it was against her will.
There are so many Laws we wouldn't dream of arguing in favor for in this day and age. So what is up with the cherry picking in regards to laws dealing with homosexuality? Why do Christians try and force a lifestyle in which some people cannot possibly be happy on those very people?
In the OT, marriage was defined by the act of sex. Most of the time, what was considered a legal marriage was completely void of any feeling or choice... Pastors will dress it up and romanticize the families written of in the Bible... Every single family in the OT had some great flaw, that is considered condemnable in today's society as well... but God blessed and prospered those families... even though they continued in their vices...
Well, what about those infamous passages in the New Testament that specifically call out homosexuals?
If you really want to refer to 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 or 1Timothy 1:10.... Then you really need to know how to go back and compare the original Greek...
Those verses used, in their original form, a word that is not found anywhere else in Greek literature existing today..."Arsenokoites"... It is a word formed of 2 words... Two words that are not among the common definition of homosexuality, but were commonly used in reference to acts associated with temple prostitution and idolatry...
...I won't go into it. If you are really curious I have given you enough information to learn about it yourself... But continuing on....
It is my challenge to Christians to reexamine what Christ really meant when He compared the Church to being His Bride...
Marriage should is not about sex anymore, it is about love... I did not marry to have sex, but I married my spouse makes me complete. Our oneness does not happen when the lights go out, our unity has NOTHING to do with sex... It is a unity of mind and spirit that happens every moment of the day... Our most intimate moments happen, not in the bedroom, but when we are working together to accomplish something of mutual purpose.
We need to think like Christ and be able to fulfill a purpose WITH Him... Believing in Him gives Him and what He did for us real purpose, and adopting His lessons of love and acceptance unify us with Him...This is the vision He presented when He spoke of His Bride.
Gay couples can and do experience this oneness with each other... They complete each other, even without children... It isn't about where a dick is supposed to fit... it is a unity of purpose and minds... The next time you are brought to consider the unity of Christ and the church, don't think of it in sexual terms... Total strangers can consent to one night stands, that mean nothing but instant gratification, but real intimacy comes from two people of the same purpose who love each other... and that is what the Church is meant for... True intimacy of purpose with Christ. So, here is my concluding thoughts for this post.... |
|
Marriage isn't defined by sex anymore, but love and oneness...
Marriage is not even a religious institution...
It is a governmental institution... If the church would continue to define marriage by sex, then homosexual couples who have had sex with each other are already married...
We, as a society, now define marriage by love... so why is it so bad that two people who love each other should be able to marry?
I would like to know why Christians feel so threatened by the fact that 2 people of the same sex who find completeness in each other should be denied the chance to file tax returns jointly, or be denied the right to have the person they trust most in the position of support when they might need it most.
How does legalizing Gay marriage undermine the moral fabric of the nation? Are Christians scared that gay couples might be the sole reason marriage in the US became a better statistic over divorce if allowed to legalize?
How does two people of the same sex marrying and adopting undermine the fabric of a hetero household? How is it bad that children with no stable home could find a stable atmosphere if homosexual couples were allowed to adopt?
Why is Homosexual marriage more horrible to some people than adultery that destroys families? Why is Christianity getting so distracted by this issue?